What should we build?
Describe your idea. H-Code builds both versions for you.
◉ Build activityView status & motion settings
Ready for your next idea · Results and progress will follow the original H-Code controls.
◇ Motion controls · Full ⌄
Choose how much movement H-Code uses. Reduced-motion system preferences always take priority.
Animations are driven by real build and preview events, never estimated usage.◇ Plan & JFH CreditsAccount setup pending
A regular JFH-CODE build uses 2 JFH Credits: a shared design and a JFH-CODE program. Additional provider requests or repairs can use more JFH Credits; TypeScript comparison is introduction-only.
The two previews are the existing compiled apps, not illustrations.
TypeScript
See the difference.
Same design, two compiled applications. Every result comes from the comparison below.
Load the example or generate both apps to see your measured comparison.
What did each language cost?
Pricing and calculation details
Token-based calculation at official standard API list prices. Includes program generation and automatic repair where reported. Shared design call is excluded from the difference. Individual invoices, special discounts and taxes are not verified.
See how they compare.
| Measurement | JFH-CODE | TypeScript | Difference |
|---|
Both programs implement the same shared HTML, CSS and behavior, so program code is the compared result; whole app adds the shared HTML and CSS. Generation counts the first program call (and a plain-text retry if a model rejected the JSON schema); with repair adds the automatic repair call. Tokens are the provider’s reported usage, including the instructions and language guide; rejected requests count as calls without tokens. Times are provider and compiler durations, not app runtime speed. The example is a demonstration.
○ Functional comparison: the shared behavior checks run automatically in an isolated copy of each preview. Passing checks cover the listed steps, not every possible behavior.